What is substance over form in accounting?

If they do not adopt the Sixth Circuit’s view, there will be a clear circuit split (if there is not already), which could make the issue ripe for the Supreme Court to weigh in. Although compliance to accounting rules is always important, you may encounter situations where these rules don’t paint the correct picture. Realize the concept of substance over form helps you build the most accurate financial reports for your clients.

• In other words, accountants should look beyond the surface of a transaction to its underlying economic substance.
• If there is a conflict between realism and form (legal aspects), an accountant needs to record the transaction based on realism which is substance and ignore legal form.
• Further, the present value of lease payment is fairly equal to the fair value of the jets, etc., which means that ABC, Inc. has undertaken a liability equal to the cost of the jets by entering into the agreement.
• And yes the goods really move from seller’s warehouse to buyer’s warehous and vice versa.

AccountingTools

And the Fifth Circuit’s 2015 decision in Pilgrim’s Pride Corp. v. Commissioner, employed a text-driven analysis to overturn the Tax Court. Of course, the Supreme Court’s 2001 decision in Gitlitz v. Commissioner reversed the Tax Court by invoking a plain reading of the text of the Code too. Anyone may so arrange his affairs that his taxes shall be as low as possible; he is not bound to choose that pattern which will best pay the Treasury; there is not even a patriotic duty to increase one’s taxes.

Application in Accounting

It arose from a 1935 Supreme Court case that disallowed tax benefits for a transaction with a form that varies from its substance. Substance over form is a particular concern under generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), because it is largely rules-based and creates specific hurdles that must be achieved in order to record a transaction a certain way. A transaction are political contributions tax deductible is an instance of an event that could alter the financial status of a business entity. It is usually a contract between a buyer and seller, which gives rise to an asset for one entity and/or a liability for the other entity. Selling inventory, buying raw materials, indulging in legal agreements and getting a bank loan are all examples of business transactions.

Role in Financial Analysis

According to this concept, if the substance of a transaction differs from its legal form, then the entity shall consider it (and account for it) in accordance with its economic reality, in order to present a true and fair view. Substance Over Form concept in accounting means recording financial transactions to truly represent the essence in statements, focusing on economic reality rather than just legal appearances. It involves complete disclosure and aims to reveal the genuine intent of transactions. In some cases, conforming to accounting rules or legal rulings won’t accurately show the reality of your client’s financial or legal standing.

This is particularly important for investors, creditors, and regulators who depend on these reports to make decisions. For example, if a company engages in sale and leaseback transactions, the principle would require the transaction to be reported in a way that shows the company’s ongoing obligation to make lease payments, rather than simply recording it as a sale. This approach enhances the quality of financial information, fostering transparency and trust in the financial markets. By recording the lease in this way, the company’s financial statements will better reflect the true economic nature of the transaction. While the principle of substance over form is typically used in complex financial situations, it can also be applied to more mundane transactions.

Trending in Accounting

The advantage of the substance over form approach in accounting is that it provides a more accurate picture of an entity’s financial position and performance. Under this approach, accountants focus on the economic reality of transactions, rather than their legal form. Substance over form is an accounting concept which means that the economic substance of transactions and events must be recorded in the financial statements rather than just their legal form in order to present a true and fair view of the affairs of the entity. Although the lessee is not the owner, the lessee may be required to record the asset as being owned by the lessee, based on the underlying economics of the transaction. Another example is the situation where a company short of cash sells its machinery to the bank and then leases the same property from the bank.

Immediately after the sale, TechBrite agrees to lease the same office space back from PropHold for a period of 10 years. This principle has far-reaching implications across various aspects of financial practices, from accounting treatments to tax considerations, and plays a critical role in financial analysis. It serves as a safeguard against misleading financial reporting and is essential for stakeholders who rely on accurate information to make informed decisions. This approach is often used when there is a discrepancy between the legal form of a transaction and its true economic value.

The principle thus maintains the sales account as reflecting only actual sales in substance (that is, items delivered to outside parties for payment), and not events that merely fit the form of sales documentation for convenience or expedience. In other words, accountants should look beyond the surface of a transaction to its underlying economic substance. So, a balance of $18,000 ($20,000-$2,000) is a balancing figure, which will be the value of the production technique sold to TT-CO. Subsequently, it was discovered that Mika plc agreed to provide a certain production technique (internally developed) along with $2,000.

The Internal Revenue Code improves matters in one sense, as it is accessible to everyone with the time and patience to pore over its provisions. After taking ownership of the Monitor stock, she sold them for over $133,000, claiming a cost of over $57,000 and a capital net gain of $76,000. On her 1928 income tax return, she reported the transaction as a tax-free corporate reorganization. The Summa Holdings decision has built on a handful of cases that have pushed back on the Service’s attempts to read more into the Code than its text provides. The Sixth Circuit’s decision in Wright v. Commissioner, decided by a different panel of judges only a number of months earlier, came to a similar conclusion.

By doing so, the principle provides a more accurate picture of a company’s financial leverage and assets, offering a clearer understanding of its financial commitments. While accounting for business transactions and other events, substance over form principle requires accountants to measure and present the economic impact of an event instead of its legal form. Substance over form approach is critical for preparation of true and fair financial statements. It is particularly relevant while accounting for revenues, sale and purchase agreements, leases etc. The Substance Over Form principle dictates that the financial statements and other accounting records should reflect the underlying economic reality of transactions, rather than merely their legal form. This concept is embedded in the accounting frameworks such as the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) and Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).

Find out how GoCardless can help you with ad hoc payments or recurring payments.